At this phase of my career, I have been around long enough and successful (or rather blessed) enough to be considered an expert in my field. This affords me the opportunity to see and work to fix complicated client issues as well as teach others how to do the same.
One mistake I see time and time again in rehab and sports training is a lack of sound sequential and functional progression. I blame part of this on the demise of insurance programs as we once knew them as therapy sessions are now limited both in scope of coverage and number of visits. But, the rest of the blame often falls squarely on the shoulders of therapists, doctors, sports performance specialists and coaches. Okay, parents may deserve a spot in my blame circle too.

Why do I say blame? Well, to be honest we often mislead or let down athletes recovering from injury by not listening enough, pushing them too hard, not pushing them hard enough, using outdated or irrelevant protocols, or incorrectly assuming they will heal like the last person with injury X. Sound at all familiar? Ever wonder why some people with the same injury recover differently and/or suffer a re-injury so soon after going back to sport?
Now, read on as this blog post is not a rant. The point I want to be crystal clear on is that we as caretakers and health providers of young athletes must be on our game at all times. This means we must be willing to continually learn and drop our assumptions, standard protocols, experiences and such at the door each time we see a new case. We must apply and adjust our plan based on each individual we see.
Ont thing I am certain of is that no two humans are exactly alike. Therefore, we must consistently assess and re-assess. I believe the real magic if you will that at times occurs for me with my athletes is less a result of my own doing and more a result of my intuition and ability to communicate and extract information at critical times from my clients.
You may think that this happens in every therapy clinic and sports training realm, but trust me when I say that line of thinking is naive. I have personally heard and witnessed too many failed rehab stories and examples of lackluster care/training to validate it. As trainers and rehab specialists, we must be willing to do the following to maximize the success of our clients:
These are just the seven biggies that come to my mind right now. The takeaway here is that training and rehab is and always should be exacting, yet flexible at the same time. Fluid, seamless tweaking and adjusting are hallmarks of all the greats. Clients should accept nothing less than this precise, analytical and results driven process, nor should we be willing to offer any less.
Following this blueprint will accelerate recovery, maximize performance gains and minimize injuries. Isn’t that what it is all about? Here’s to harnessing our passion and giving the absolute BEST to those we are fortunate enough to serve.
Core training is common terminology thrown around in fitness circles today. However, not much research has specifically addressed more advanced stability ball exercises and muscle activation until now.
A recent article released in the May 2010 Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy looked at 8 stability ball exercises and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) versus traditional bent knee curl ups and crunches.
The 8 stability ball exercises studied with EMG were:

Pike (end position)
All exercises were performed with a cadence of 1/1/1. A metronome was used to ensure uniform repetitions and holds. Researchers concluded that the pike and roll-out were the most effective exercises based on EMG activation. However, keep in mind that these also require the greatest effort and pose a high degree of difficulty.
Why is this stuff important? Research done by Cholecki and VanVliet concluded that no single core muscle can be identified as the most important for spinal stability. Additionally, they believe that the relative importance of the muscle varies based on the direction and magnitude of the load imposed on the spine.
We have known for years the spine is least stable and most vulnerable in trunk flexion (as in the knee bent curl up), and that no one muscle contributes more than 30% to overall spine stability. Choosing more demanding core exercises also typically increases spinal compressive forces as well. This may be contraindicated in some populations.
Therefore knowing your client and condition is essential. For example, flexion is often contraindicated with active disk pathology, whereas it may be indicated in those with facet arthropathy or spondylolisthesis. Over the past decade or so, much attention has been placed on the transversus abdominus muscle.
The prevalent thinking has been that it is a major contributor to spinal stability, although this is somewhat controversial and has not been unequivocally validated with science. Another flaw here is that isolated contractions of it have not been demonstrated in higher level activities (e.g. sports).
So, where is the functional tie in here? The transeversus abdominus has shown similar activation patterns (within 15%) to the internal obliques with exercises similar to those in this study. The highest activity from internal obliques was during the pike, roll-out, knee up, skier and hip extension left exercise. This may indicate that transveresus abdominus activation is also high, but further research will need to be done.
The last critical piece of data involves looking at hip flexor activation as the psoas generates remarkable spinal compression and anterior shear forces at L5-S1. This can be especially troubling for individuals struggling with lumbar disk pathology. The exercise in this stud that demonstrated moderate hip flexor activation were:
So, if you or your client has a weak rectus abdominus and/or obliques or lumbar instability, these exercises may be contraindicated. In the end, know that the stability ball provides much greater muscle activation compared to traditional bent knee sit-ups and crunches on the floor. The caveat is identifying which ones are appropriate and most efficient in your case.
As a general rule, I suggest that you avoid long lever arm action with the legs in the presence of active disk pathology and instability. You may opt for stability based exercises in a neutral spine position like planks as there is minimal shear and compressive loading here until clients develop more stability and strength. With healthy and mroe advanced clientele, many of the stability ball exercises studied would be good alternatives to traditional crunch work to build muscle strength for the core.
It is no secret that Americans are trying to stay more active well into their baby boomer years and beyond. The million dollar question is how will what you do today affect your joints down the road.
Scholars, scientists and medical experts do not seem to agree 100% on what is too much, but most tend to agree that excessive running, obesity, irregular or unusually intense activity (think weekend warriors here), muscular weakness and even decreased flexibility may all contribute to arthritis.
The New York Times recently ran a story about the cost of total joint replacement and suggestions on how people can be proactive to reduce the risk and debilitating effects of arthritis. Click here to read the article.
I think one of the most amusing yet ironic things about science is that it often contradicts itself. Obviously, we know being overweight increases stress on the load bearing joints. Most people would also knowingly acknowledge that improved strength and flexibility would make for healthier knees and hips.
The big question mark for me is impact loading, or simply the argument of whether to run or not to run. Some docs say no way. Others say yes. Yet others offer more ambiguous words on the subject. So, what do I think?
I honestly believe there may be no absolute answer. I am not convinced running on a treadmill is all that much better for you as some would suggest either. My body tells me blacktop surfaces are better than cement sidewalks, while the soft earth is better yet still. I use the treadmill in the winter and for speed work but if you run events too much treadmill work will let you down on race day as the body is ill prepared.
Much like exercise prescription, I think joint loading and tolerance is a very individual matter indeed. Biomechanics, posture, training history, medical history, repetitive movements, footwear, nutrition, body type, recovery, etc are just a few of the variables one must consider when passing judgment on exercise prescription and limits.
Beyond that, the best indication to reduce or remove an activity for a short bit or long term is obviously pain. But before doing so, one must correctly identify the source of the pain. At times, the pain may seem like a joint issue when in fact it could simply stem from poor muscle recruitment, lack of mobility or faulty movement patterns thereby subjecting joints to undue stress.
I say all this to say we must be careful in saying one should not do something definitively. Some folks run well into their 80’s without issues. Others break down after one endurance event. In the end, we must face facts. The human body is complex and no two people are exactly alike. I had left hip pain years ago that felt like arthritis. My orthopd told me the x-ray showed a few mild bone spurs and mild hip dysplasia.
His advice? Quit running. I did for 6 months and the pain did not subside. So, I began a progressive running program and changed up my strength training to more single leg based work. Guess what? My pain went away 100%. This tells me the impact itself was not likely the cause of my pain, but more likely a muscle imbalance that I overcame through more efficient strength training.
We must look at science, anecdotal findings and clinical experience to pull out general patterns and thoughts all the while continuing to use assessment, feedback and results to lead us to the best conclusion for each client, patient or athlete. You must use all this information to make the best decision for your situation as well.
So, I have made part of my living the past several years helping people overcome shoulder pain. I often laugh when I hear people say “how hard can putting together an exercise program really be? It’s not rocket science or anything.” Well, maybe not, but getting it just right may mean the difference between a healthy shoulder and really hurting.
There is a new study soon to be released saying weight training injuries are on the rise (especially in males). In fact, injuries are up 50% from the period between 1990 and 2007. The majority of these injuries involved free weights. Many of the upper body injuries I see almost always involve the rotator cuff and/or labrum. Why? There are some primary reasons such as:
What most people fail to understand is that the high repetition associated with weightlifting coupled with unfavorable biomechanical stress through long lever arms leads to eventual mechanical breakdowns/failure. The basic translation = fraying, degeneration, tendinitis, tendinosis and tears.
This pattern equates to lost time in the gym and in some cases surgery. The ironic part is the damage is often done in the early lifting years but not seen or felt for a decade or two later. This is why the young twenty somethings like to debate me on the modifications I suggest for bench presses and such. Yet, read what one former power lifter recently emailed me below:
Yes you can count me as another one of your satisfied customers. I followed your 6 week injured series religiously and have recently moved on the your healthy shoulder series.
My main concern at this point is to avoid injuring the shoulder again and I will follow your advice on the 7 bonus exercises listed. My background fits the profile mentioned in your manual - 46 years old, former power lifter, injured dominant shoulder doing barbell presses about 6 months ago. I have been doing presses for over 30 years and unfortunately never read about the scapular plane.
The take home message is that modifying the load and adjusting the arc of movement with certain lifting exercises will indeed prevent common shoulder injuries and keep you in the gym for many years to come without the fear of a lifting injury.
While the hard core lifters and competitors may scoff at my application of the science and my suggestions now, they may also suddenly come to realize the potential consequences of their ways when a debilitating shoulder injury hits. Am I saying full range of motion and heavy loads are absolutely forbidden? No, but I do think you should ask yourself how often and for what purpose am I doing certain lifts in certain ranges of motion.
Additionally, I am saying that insufficient muscular balance coupled with repetitive load to near failure will over time result in acquired laxity, accelerated tendon degeneration and potential mechanical failure. Gravity and friction are two forces that will tear a shoulder down over time with exercises such as pressing, flies, dips, upright rows, side raises and push-ups to name a few.
So, the next time you feel a “twinge” in the shoulder with lifting, it may be time to consider backing off and making some changes in your routine as time and experience has taught me the rotator cuff and A-C joint will eventually say "enough is enough." If you want more information on my exercise modifications, check out my shoulder book at www.rotatorcufftraining.com.
So, do you own a TRX? I honestly think it may be one of the best fitness training pieces around for the money. It is versatile, travels well and builds strength, stamina, balance and stability.
I use the TRX to train clients of all ages and abilities from my elite swimmer to the middle age woman with knee arthritis. Some of the biggest objections to getting in shape I hear are:
So, my solution is to buy a TRX. In this short video, I outline a continuous sequence of 7 exercises. They are not intense, but they can be made more challenging by altering the body vector (moving your body in relation to the attachment point) and adding more time and sets within the circuit all with very little rest. The sequence of exercises in the video are:
I demo 5 reps of each exercise in the video to show you how to do it, but in reality you crank through each exercise for at least 30 seconds. Using the TRX over the door anchor you can do this workout at home or on the road (and far more advanced exercises as well) in less than 20 minutes and see results.
So, say goodbye to all the objections and get yourself a TRX and door anchor if you don’t have one yet. I am 100% confident you will love the workouts and add a new dimension to your fitness routine.
From now until March 11, all my readers can save 15% on the TRX door anchor by visiting my OpenSky shop and using the promo code ANCHOR15. Click here to visit my shop. In addition to this discount, you are eligible to receive 10% off any of the spring promo items at OpenSky.
To see the entire collection of items in the Spring promotion click here.