Brian Schiff’s Blog

I have been attending the 26th Annual Cincinnati Sports Medicine Advances on the Shoulder and Knee conference in Hilton Head, SC.  This is my first time here and the course has not disappointed.  I have always known that Dr. Frank Noyes is a very skilled surgeon and has a great group in Cincinnati as I am originally an Ohio guy too.

So, I thought I would just share a few little nuggets that I have taken away from the first three days of the course so far.  I am not going into great depth, but suffice it to say these pearls shed some light on some controversial and difficult problems we see in sports medicine.

Shoulder Tidbits

1. Fixing SLAP tears may not always fix shoulder pain as in many cases it may be in part due to posterior capsule tightness and anterior instability leading to internal impingement.  Additionally, many of the docs here choose not to repair type 2 tears in those over 40 tears and provide a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis to instead to deliver more predictable pain relief as opposed to a labral repair.
2. Intraoperative pain pumps in the shoulder are causing glenohumeral joint chondrolysis in the shoulder in many cases. According to the panel of docs, this has been seen in teenagers and patients in their twenties as well.  They have often undergone other procedures from outside docs and then developed increasing pain afterward.  Many have had to even undergo a total shoulder replacement after a few years post-op.  The MDs here have suggested even post-operative Marcaine injections for pain relief in the shoulder should probably not be used.  It was very sad to see an 18 y/o shoulder x-ray they put up that looked as if the patient was 80 years old.
3. Double row rotator cuff tendon repairs seem to outperform single row repairs with respect to tendon healing (90% for DR and 76% for SR techniques in a comprehensive review of the literature)
4. Stretching cross body horizontal adduction may be more important for throwers and overhead athletes than the sleeper stretch – best to have a therapist stabilize the scapula and then move the shoulder across the body keeping the shoulder in neutral rotation (it will tend to externally rotate)
5. Arthroscopic stabilization is better than open surgery for posterior shoulder instability as the posterior cuff and deltoid are not violated, ROM recovery is more predictable, patient satisfaction is higher and there is a more predictable return to sport

Knee Tidbits

1. Increased femoral anteversion and torsion is a developmental factor that does in fact control the knee to a great extent. The tibial tubercle-sulcus angle, thigh-foot angle and foot alignment is also key according to Dr. Lonnie Paulos.  In cases of miserable patella mal-alignment, many will need de-rotation and re-alignment procedures to improve their symptoms.
2. The consensus among the orthopods here was that using a bone-tendon-bone patella tendon autograft to reconstruct torn ACLs in the younger more active athletes (soccer players and football players) is preferable to a hamstring graft or allograft.  Allografts did not seem to be the graft of choice by any of the docs for the younger patients.  Some would use a hamstring autograft provided there was no MCL pathology.  The PTG autograft was the gold standard for years (always my favorite graft choice for high level/demand athletes) so I was pleased to see the trend for this population moving away from the ST/gracilis HS grafts.
3. Kevin Wilk, DPT (primary PT for Dr. James Andrews), was advocating restoring full and symmetrical ROM after ACL surgery.  I tend to agree with this principle myself.  However, Dr. Noyes was not in agreement and rather cautiously noted he would be okay with about 3 degrees of hyperextension on the repaired side no matter how much hyperextension was available on the other side.  Kevin also noted that restoring full flexion was paramount to restoring running mechanics and speed in higher level athletes.
4. The golden time to repair a MCL tear is in the first 7-10 days.  Dr. Paulos also suggested it is absolutely necessary to fix the deep layer as well as the superficial layer.  His talk emphasized how big of a mistake it is to not repair the deep layer.  He also warns that the strength of the repair is less important than restoring proper length, tension and collagen.
5. For PCL augmented repairs, a 2 bundle repair is repaired.  Most of the docs like to use a quad tendon autograft from the contralateral thigh, but will take it from the same leg if patients insist.  The consensus seemed to be that a repair should be done if there is 10 millimeters or more of drop off.

These are just some of the highlights I wanted to pass along.  There was lots of other good stuff (much of it a nice review of anatomy, biomechanics and protocol guidelines for rehab) but I wanted to pass along some of these key items while they were fresh in my head.  I will likely be sharing more in the future, particularly with respect to patello-femoral pain and SLAP tears as these are just so controversial in terms of surgical and rehab management.

So, I recently blogged on platelet rich plasma (PRP).  I wanted to provide you with the latest up to date info on this procedure in regard to chronic tendinitis.  Many people suffer from lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).  This is a condition that affects the extensor tendons in the elbow.  Most experts link tendon injuries to hypovascularity (not enough blood flow) and repetitive micro-trauma thereby resulting in localized weakness and degeneration over time.

This may lead to eventual rupture but no one can predict that for sure.  Using PRP would hypothetically reverse the effects of chronic tendinopathy while stimulating healing at a microscopic level by initiating revascularization.  The info and data for this post was in large part taken from the American Journal of Sports Medicine (Nov. 09).

It is important to keep in mind if you are dealing with tennis elbow to understand the difference between acute injury and chronic pain.  Physiologically, healing enters the chronic phase in 22 days post injury.  However, from a clinical perspective, a physician may not consider elbow tendinitis chronic until after 3 months or more in some cases.  While PRP has shown positive results in several small case studies, the abundance of solid research is still lacking or too small to draw finite conclusions as to its efficacy.

With that said, let me share some data for people who were treated for tennis elbow with PRP:

• Mishra & Pavelko treated 20 patients out of a sample of 140 with elbow pain who met their inclusion criteria.  Of those 20, 15 were given PRP and 5 served as controls receiving only local anesthetic injections.  The PRP group noted a 60% improvement at 8 weeks, 81% at 6 months and 93% at the final follow-up (range b/w 12 and 38 months).  However, 3 of the 5 controls withdrew from the study early to seek other treatment which means the data can only be drawn from the PRP group.  Although flawed with a small group and attrition in the control group, this study was prospective and did include a control group.

What does this mean?  Well, if you have ever suffered from lateral epicondylitis or worked with those that have, you know how difficult this condition can be to resolve.  I know several people that opted for surgery to end the pain.  Conservative treatment often consists of ice, rest, stretching. strengthening and cross fiber massage.  Some use a Band-it brace and acupuncture as well.  In the end, it can be down right debilitating.

PRP may provide a better answer, but more research and larger trials are needed to confirm the overall efficacy of it.  If you are a chronic sufferer though, you may want to seek out an orthopedist who is proficient in this and take a look.  Aside from tendinitis, the effects on muscle strain, ligament tears and bone are also being studied.  High level athletes are using PRP to get back to play faster as one unpublished study with professional soccer players suffering grade II MCL injuries reports a 27% faster return to play after injury compared to controls when injected with PRP within 72 hours of the injury.

In the end, the optimal dosage and use of PRP has yet to be defined.  But it may certainly signal a new era of treatment of soft tissue injuries and speed the recovery from such injuries.

Okay, today I am going to rant just a bit about two fundamental problems in modern America with repsect to medicine.  Before I get started, let me first say this blog post is not a universal generalization or assessment of all people or all physicians.  With that said, here is the email I received from a customer today that has spurred this post:

“I’ve started on the rotator cuff muscle exercises and my right shoulder is already feeling better. The left shoulder, which has been torn for the longest, is not yet showing a noticeable improvement. Considering my doctor told me I’d have to ‘put up and shut up’ I am feeling very pleased.“

So here are the 2 problems:

1. MD’s are typically trained to prescribe pills and operate as opposed to encouraging and trusting the human mind and body to heal itself with the proper intervention
2. Too many people just blindly accept the physician’s treatment approach without considering other qualified opinions or asking “why” the MD feels that way

In the case of my client above, the MD obviously told the patient if she chose not to undergo an operation that she would continue to suffer and needed to shut up and quit complaining.  While one shoulder has yet to improve, in less than one week on my program she is already seeing positive improvement.  Hmmm.  Surgery or exercise to relieve shoulder pain.  What would you choose out of the gate?  This is a no brainer in my mind.

Now, this client has a backbone and chose to look at other options.  Thankfully, she believes there is another way.  She did not just say okay and get in line for surgery.  She is optimistic that she can use conservative means to achieve pain resolution and restore function.  Trust me when I tell you the human body is remarkably resilient.  It will generally heal on its own if we simply get out of its way.  Too often, we ignore what it tells us and just do more damage until there is no choice aside from cortisone, pain pills or surgery to allow us to return to what we need to do as soon as possible.  Perhaps we simply need to practice patience over instant gratification.

 So, I want to encourage you to critically analyze what people tell you to do when it comes to your body.  Ask this magic one word question: “Why?”  Always know the “why” behind what you do when it comes to exercise, medication, surgery, etc.  I always have a “why” for every exercise I prescribe and implement in a client’s program.  There is no room for mindless prescription in exercise or medicine.  We need to treat every person differently based on their specific injury, needs, goals, work and life demands, and past medical history. 

My intention in sharing this post is not to bash physicians.  There are lots of excellent docs who practice case by case decision making and serve as true patient advocates.  However, there are also many who need to take a step back and recognize that pills and surgery are not always the answer despite what statistics and tendencies tell us.  If you or someone you know is suffering, be sure to ask their health care professionals “why.”