Brian Schiff’s Blog

It is no secret that Americans are trying to stay more active well into their baby boomer years and beyond.  The million dollar question is how will what you do today affect your joints down the road. 

Scholars, scientists and medical experts do not seem to agree 100% on what is too much, but most tend to agree that excessive running, obesity, irregular or unusually intense activity (think weekend warriors here), muscular weakness and even decreased flexibility may all contribute to arthritis.

The New York Times recently ran a story about the cost of total joint replacement and suggestions on how people can be proactive to reduce the risk and debilitating effects of arthritis.  Click here to read the article.

I think one of the most amusing yet ironic things about science is that it often contradicts itself.  Obviously, we know being overweight increases stress on the load bearing joints.  Most people would also knowingly acknowledge that improved strength and flexibility would make for healthier knees and hips. 

The big question mark for me is impact loading, or simply the argument of whether to run or not to run.  Some docs say no way.  Others say yes.  Yet others offer more ambiguous words on the subject.  So, what do I think?

I honestly believe there may be no absolute answer.  I am not convinced running on a treadmill is all that much better for you as some would suggest either.  My body tells me blacktop surfaces are better than cement sidewalks, while the soft earth is better yet still.  I use the treadmill in the winter and for speed work but if you run events too much treadmill work will let you down on race day as the body is ill prepared. 

Much like exercise prescription, I think joint loading and tolerance is a very individual matter indeed.  Biomechanics, posture, training history, medical history, repetitive movements, footwear, nutrition, body type, recovery, etc are just a few of the variables one must consider when passing judgment on exercise prescription and limits.

Beyond that, the best indication to reduce or remove an activity for a short bit or long term is obviously pain.  But before doing so, one must correctly identify the source of the pain.  At times, the pain may seem like a joint issue when in fact it could simply stem from poor muscle recruitment, lack of mobility or faulty movement patterns thereby subjecting joints to undue stress.

I say all this to say we must be careful in saying one should not do something definitively.  Some folks run well into their 80’s without issues.  Others break down after one endurance event.  In the end, we must face facts.  The human body is complex and no two people are exactly alike.  I had left hip pain years ago that felt like arthritis.  My orthopd told me the x-ray showed a few mild bone spurs and mild hip dysplasia. 

His advice?  Quit running.  I did for 6 months and the pain did not subside.  So, I began a progressive running program and changed up my strength training to more single leg based work.  Guess what?  My pain went away 100%.  This tells me the impact itself was not likely the cause of my pain, but more likely a muscle imbalance that I overcame through more efficient strength training.

We must look at science, anecdotal findings and clinical experience to pull out general patterns and thoughts all the while continuing to use assessment, feedback and results to lead us to the best conclusion for each client, patient or athlete.  You must use all this information to make the best decision for your situation as well.

Wow!  It has been a busy two weeks for me.  I have been putting the final touches on a DVD and writing a ton of articles lately.  I just returned from speaking for Power Systems at a Total Training Seminar in Missouri in late March.  It is always interesting speaking and hearing other presenters.

There is usually no shortage of controversy and conflicting opinions either when it comes to fitness and training.  One speaker mentioned that it is perfectly okay to allow the knee to go over the toe with exercise.  In fact, this presenter said it was desirable to maximize training.   My talk (later on) was on bodyweight training for a healthier knee.

Naturally, I was asked what I thought about the earlier comment.  My answer was “it is complicated.”  I am not sure that is what the audience wanted me to say.  Pressed again later on, I acknowledged that in a repetitve training environment, lunging and squatting with the knee over the toe is not something I recommend.  However, if I am retraining a client to be able to descend stairs one foot over the other, the knee does in fact move beyond the toes.

So, there are times in life, where we need to think outside absolutes and adjust our thoughts and training to meet the needs of people at a current time and space so to speak.  The real trick is knowing the client, their medical condition, their needs and measuring the response from the body.  I hate protocols because no two people are the same, nor do their bodies heal and react the same way.

But, let’s get back to the knee.  I talked about assessing the knee and then integrating the “right exercises” to not only correct dysfunction but also to improve fitness and performance.  If you think body weight training is useless or for sissies, you may want to think again particularly if you like to run and have any issues with patellofemoral pain (most women do have PF pain or early arthritis).

Consider the research from the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy in 2003 where Powers et al. determined that PF joint forces are significantly  greater with external loading versus bodyweight only in flexion angles begining at 45 degrees during eccentric loading (lowering down while peaking at 90 degrees) and concentric loading (rising up) at 90 and 75 degrees.   What does this mean for you?

Essentially, if you are a runner and suffer from PF pain, you may want to limit deeper range of motion with squatting and/or consider limiting the amount of external loading as well.  Even better, you should be doing single leg training keeping this same information in mind.  Training is an exact science and most people get it wrong all the time.  That is why I am currently working on a Fit Knees DVD series to give trainers and consumers relevant and science based information to direct their training for optimal health and performance.

I just finished volume three in this series and it is ready for official release this Friday.  If you are a runner and want a blueprint to train for injury prevention and peak performance, this DVD is for you.  Or, if you are a runner who is currently injured or has been plagued by overuse injuries, it is still for you as I have a complete progressive rehab series on the DVD to get you back up and running again. 

As a runner myself, I have put these strategies to good use with much success.  I thought it was fitting to relase the DVD this week as I prepare to run my 4th half marathon in Charlotte this weekend.  Below you will see the product display. 

As a blog subscriber or reader, I am offering you $10 off the normal price of $34.95 through midnight Saturday.  Simply visit www.fitknees.com and use the copuon code BFITRUN (all caps) at checkout.  I am confident you will find it valuable as it covers training from A-Z with warm-up prep, foam rolling, balance training, strength and power exercises, rehab and stretching.  It is 65 minutes of power packed content.  Here’s to healthier knees and happy running!

Anterior knee pain, aka chondromalacia, patellofemoral pain (PFP) and patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), may be the most difficult condition to remedy in the clinic or gym.  There is always debate and speculation when it comes to taping, bracing, orthotics and exercise.

In the latest edition of the JOSPT, there was a summary from the findings presented at an international retreat held in the spring of 2009 in Maryland.  The publication covered the keynote addresses and podium presentations.

Before I give you the quick and dirty details, I want to emphasize a key point that was made and one I happen to wholeheartedly agree with.  It is this:

When assessing and evaluating those with PFPS, it is important to recognize that these patients/clients do not necessarily fit under one broad classification system.  The anterior knee pain issue is multi-factorial and not every person has the same issues or abnormalities.  As such, the exercise prescription most likely will need to be tweaked accordingly for best results.

Okay, now on to the highlights that may impact your training/rehab.  Some researchers from Belgium have been conducting prospective studies looking at intrinsic risk factors for developing PFPS.  They looked at physical education students and novice runners.  Major findings are included below:

Study #1

There were 4 variables identified as risk factors:

• Decreased flexibility of the quadriceps
• Decreased explosive strength of the quadriceps
• Altered neuromuscular coordination b/w the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO)
• Hypermobility of the patella

Study #2

• More laterally directed plantar pressure distribution at initial (foot) contact during walking and more laterally directed rollover are risk factors for developing PFPS

Study #3

• Unable to link hip muscle strength (or weakness) to increasing risk for PFPS
• No apparent correlation with frontal plane motion of the knee and hip strength (so hip weakness will not automatically cause knee pain)

Finally, what does this mean for therapists and fitness pros?  It means…….

1. They should address the 4 intrinsic risk factors by stretching and strengthening the quads, with a particular emphasis on balancing the VMO strength in relation to VL strength.  This is not new information.  Spending time on closed chain terminal range strengthening is important. 
2. Second, keenly observing a dynamic disturbance in foot alignment at contact is important  for predicting PFPS and will undoubtedly impact dynamic training protocols for the entire kinetic chain. 
3. Lastly, continue to strengthen the hip even though the final study revealed no apparent link.  However, perhaps focus more on this when there is a definitive weakness side-to-side that has been identified.  So, don’t fall back on the weak gluteus medius by default; rather use dysfunction as a driver for exercise inclusion.

PFPS is and will continue to be a difficult problem to treat and remedy with exercise.  Further research is needed to determine and evaluate more specific gender differences, kinetic chain links, the efficacy of taping/bracing, and the most effective classification and treatment algorithms for those of us in the trenches.  In the meantime, listen to the body and use the best available science and information to move forward with your training. 

Reference: JOSPT March 2010

It is fairly well accepted in medical/rehab circles that much of the lateral knee pain felt by runners is related to the IT band.  Researchers report that frictional forces are greatest between 20 and 30 degrees of knee flexion (this occurs in the first part of stance phase with running).   But what about the differences in hip and knee kinematics between healthy and injured subjects?

I currently train two competitive female marathoners.  Both are in their thirties.  One has run Boston and the other is training with me to qualify this year (she missed by 36 seconds last year).  Many female runners deal with iliotibial band issues during their training.  My client trying to qualify for Boston has issues on her right side.  My other runner does not.  The client affected by this also has some ankle instability which certainly affects closed chain mechanics.

Historically, researchers have felt increased rear-foot eversion has contributed to such injuries.  Why?  well, increased rear-foot eversion leads to increased tibial internal rotation, and by the ITB’s attachment point distally on the tibia this would in turn increase strain.  In addition, it has been postulated that gluteus medius weakness leads to greater hip adduction moments and undue strain.

One recent prospective study done by Noehren et al. concluded that runners who developed ITBS exhibited increased hip adduction and knee internal rotation angles compared to healthy controls.  Today, I wanted to briefly update you on a study just published in the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy looking at the running mechanics of those with previous bouts of ITBS and those without.  The study observed 35 healthy female runners and 35 age matched runners (ages 18-45 who run no less than 30K/week) with a history of ITB issues.  They measured:

1. Hip, knee and ankle kinematics
2. Internal moments during stance phase

So, what did the results say?  In a nutshell, the ITBS group did in fact exhibit increased hip adduction angles and peak internal rotation angles at the knee.  There was , however, no significant difference among groups with respect to the rear-foot eversion.  This particular study did not measure hip abductor strength.

As far as limitations to the study, one primary one was the fact that the ITBS group was healthy during the study (meaning they had some time in the past suffered ITBS).  With that said, the results did mirror the prospective study by Noehren.

The practical takeaways for runners and trainers are:

• Prior ITB issues may increase risk for recurrence due to increased strain
• Prior ITB issues indicate atypical hip and knee kinematics may be present
• The rear-foot position may have a lesser role in causation of ITBS
• Addressing hip stability, strength and eccentric control is paramount to injury prevention
• Observing frontal/transverse plane knee mechanics is prudent

In training, I recommmend video analysis or using a mirror independently to observe what I term a single leg hop and stick maneuver.  I teach it to all my cutting and impact athletes.  Simply begin on the left leg and hop forward onto the right and lower down into a lunge type single leg landing position.

Observe the foot/ankle, knee and hip as the body declerates.  This image and sequence of events leaves strong clues about the strength and force dissipation that is or isn’t happening.  Perform at least 3 trials and repeat on the other side.  This evalaution technique then also becomes a training tool to correct imbalances and improve deceleration mechanics – the very essence of the injury problem to begin with.

I routinely have my athletes with assymetrical or atypical kinematics engage in this drill no less than 2-3 times per week.  I have them perform 2-3 sets of 5-10 quality reps on each side (alternate sides).  Focus on preventing the femur from adducting too much or the patella moving inward.  In addition to this drill, obviously include steady glute max and medius work in your programs to help reduce ITBS.  With all that said, happy running!

Well, I have an update on player x.  She saw my preferred soccer/knee orthopedist in town on Wednesday.  He examined her and read the comments I gave to her mother as well.  In summary, he agreed with me that she had patello-femoral pain/inflammation.

He also told the mother she had just gone back to soccer too quickly and never fully regained her quad strength.  He told her if she continued to work around the deficit, she would likely suffer another injury.  This is often the case.  So, at this point the plan of action is to take a one month hiatus from soccer and do formal rehab three times per week.

While this process will be much slower and less active for player x, it probably will be for the best in the long run.  In the short term, she may suffer some loss of fitness, but she needs to focus on strengthening right now.  I will keep you updated on her progress as time goes by.  She will likely return to me for conditioning to transition her safely back to full soccer once therapy winds down.